Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:18:08 From: Stephen Arnott <sarnott-AT-metz.une.edu.au> Subject: Re: Scotus and Univocity Thanks for that Paul. It did in fact clear something up for me. I am currently working on the 'Machinic Heterogeneis' chapter of Chaosmosis from which you quoted ( I'd better get on with it!), so if I have any thoughts I'll let you know. When G. says that there's no ontological foundation for existential machines, isn't he just reminding the reader that his metaphysics doesn't work like those that ground, that belong to the philosophy of representation. While the machines have no ontological ground, they do have an ontological unground, groundlessness, universal 'ungrounding' as Deleuze calls it in DR - ie, difference in itself. Steve
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005