From: simonini-AT-HomeNet.com.br (Eduardo Simonini Lopes)
Subject:  Re: Dancing Body Without Organs?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 17:37:02 -0300


Unleesh-AT-aol.com , wrote:
>" BWO is a war against evolution,"
>
>How could you possibly war against evolution?
**************

Well, the BWO is an element of immanence. Evolution is an element os the
transcendent conception of the world.
The war against evolution is too a war agaist hierarchies of all kinds.
When we talk about evolution we are speaking about a system where the future
is better than the past. Use these kinds of comparative terms is to register
the things and makes bodys full of organs.
The BWO is pure flux, but not evolution... in the flux there isn't the
concepts of "better" or "worse" or "beautiful" or "ugly",..., there is just
the intensity which create and destroy universes...

(sorry my poor english)

Eduardo - Brasil
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Unleesh-AT-aol.com <Unleesh-AT-aol.com>
Para: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
<deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Outubro de 1998 14:48
Assunto: Re: Re: Dancing Body Without Organs?


>" BWO is a war against evolution,"
>
>How could you possibly war against evolution? That would be to privilege
the
>present term, or to privilege some term somewhere. Rather, perhaps its a
>matter of shifting evolution's terms, making evolution less linear and more
>transversal, making the aesthetics of selection more marvelous. Since when
>would the BwO have any problems with Proteus?