Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 15:57:59 -0500 (EST) From: Inna Runova Semetsky <irs5-AT-columbia.edu> Subject: Re: Multiplicity and Becoming More in Deleuze and Guattari - "transversal" brings in thirdness, a diagonalal dimension in addition to horizontal and vertical - or if you wish - a diagrammatic in addition to syntagmatic and paradigmatic. Diagram is a huge concept in Peirce (diagrammatic reasoning etc). But also Deleuze taks about "inbetweeness" - non-place where becomings happen. In a sense both Deleuze and Peirce (if you stretch Peirce) talk about logic of INCLUDED middle. inna On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Vadim Verenits wrote: > Please help me .... i want to trace the connection between Peirce > trichotomy and deleuzian ideas > Vadim > > > On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Chris Peterson wrote: > > > Actually Patrick I just got your book in the mail today, and it is a > > life-saver! The chapter on James is exactly what I needed. I am currently > > at the New School for Social Research taking a class on Pragmatism with > > Richard Bernstein. I have been bugging him all semester about any > > connections between Deleuze and James and have not gotten vary far... > > However, today, I am slowly cranking out a paper for him on this very > > subject. Thanks so much for your research and your work. > > > > Chris > > ---------- > > >From: Patrick Hayden <phkm-AT-totalnetnh.net> > > >To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > >Subject: Re: Deleuze the empiricist > > >Date: Thu, Dec 3, 1998, 10:39 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Chris Peterson wrote: > > > > > >> Yes, Deleuze is an empiricist! And I do agree that it is of a 'very > > >> particular kind', it takes on a sort of pluarist or transcendental quality > > >> that rigoriously engages the chaotic and moving nature of reality. Much of > > >> what it has to do with, I believe, are conceptualizing relatations as > > >> exterior to their terms: no longer keeping the connections tied > > >> intrinsically to the terms, and instead accepting the movement and dynamism > > >> of the middle. > > >> > > >> I think that William James would be a great source for seeing another > > >> example of this special strain of empiricism with his notion of radical > > >> empiricism... > > >> > > >> chris > > >> ---------- > > >> >From: Stephen Arnott <sarnott-AT-metz.une.edu.au> > > >> >To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > > >> >Subject: Deleuze the empiricist > > >> >Date: Thu, Dec 3, 1998, 9:45 AM > > >> > > > >> > > >> >At 10:52 AM 11/30/98 -0500, Inna wrote: > > >> >>What about Deleuze having said in Diaalogues - I consider myself an > > >> >>empiricist hence pluralist - or smth like that? > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >Sure but his empiricism is of a particular kind. He'd undoubtedly consider > > >> >Spinoza an empiricist which very few others would. He calls himself a > > >> >transcendental empiricist, in order to stress that his philosophy is > > >> >concerned with the necessary conditions of real experience. Univocal > > >> >difference is such a necessary condition and in no way compromises > > >> >plurality, rather the reverse - it ensures it. > > >> > > > >> >Steve > > >> > > > > > > > > > >Chris, Steve, etc. > > > > > >I've only recently joined the list and I'm glad to see there is interest in > > >exploring Deleuze's connections with empiricism. If I may be so bold as to > > >engage in some conspicuous self-promotion, you might be interested in > > >consulting my following publications: > > > > > >*Multiplicity and Becoming: The Pluralist Empiricism of Gilles Deleuze* (Peter > > >Lang Publishing, 1998). This work includes a chapter on the role of external > > >relations in Deleuze's philosophy (a modified version of the paper below), > > >which is discussed in light of William James' radical empiricism. > > > > > >"Gilles Deleuze and Naturalism: A Convergence with Ecological Theory and > > >Politics," Environmental Ethics, Summer 1997 (a somewhat revised version of > > >this paper comprises the final chapter of the book above). > > > > > >"From Relations to Practice in the Empiricism of Gilles Deleuze," Man and > > >World, July 1995 (attempts to highlight the significance of external relations > > >for Deleuze, via Hume, and how such a perspective on relations contributes to > > >D&G's rhizome). > > > > > >Quite simply, one of the most powerful lessons I've taken from Deleuze is that > > >life is about making connections, multiplying connections. . . . becoming. > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > >Patrick > > > > > > > > > > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005