File spoon-archives/deleuze-guattari.archive/deleuze-guattari_1998/deleuze-guattari.9812, message 285


Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:22:42 +0000
From: Daniel Haines <daniel-AT-tw2.com>
Subject: Re: ideology?


amd wrote:
> 
> Representations - axiomatic ideas, myths, symbols- underlie a group of
> behaviours. Attitudes and types of actions constitute a group of behaviours.

can't begin to respond to your points here; however this bit intrigued
me - I realise I have pulled it from its context, but it struck me as
positing in some sense the idea of "ideology" as such.  obviously, d&g
were fond of saying "there is no ideology and never has been" and so I
wondered, firstly - how do these sentences NOT put forward an idea of
"ideology", and secondly, how do you - or anyone - see d&g's rejection
of ideology as an philosophical/political/explanatory notion?

anyone? or am I getting this confused ? (I've never really "got" exactly
what ideology is meant to be (in a rigorous sense), which is why I'm
asking this question!)

dan h.


-- 
http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/chupacabras/48/     
http://www.tw2.com/staff/daniel/

Ware ware Karate-do o shugyo surumonowa,
Tsuneni bushido seishin o wasurezu,
Wa to nin o motte nashi,
Soshite tsutomereba kanarazu tasu.

We who study Karate-do,
Should never forget the spirit of the samurai,
With peace, perseverance and hard work,
We will reach our goal without failure.

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005