Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 09:22:42 +0000 From: Daniel Haines <daniel-AT-tw2.com> Subject: Re: ideology? amd wrote: > > Representations - axiomatic ideas, myths, symbols- underlie a group of > behaviours. Attitudes and types of actions constitute a group of behaviours. can't begin to respond to your points here; however this bit intrigued me - I realise I have pulled it from its context, but it struck me as positing in some sense the idea of "ideology" as such. obviously, d&g were fond of saying "there is no ideology and never has been" and so I wondered, firstly - how do these sentences NOT put forward an idea of "ideology", and secondly, how do you - or anyone - see d&g's rejection of ideology as an philosophical/political/explanatory notion? anyone? or am I getting this confused ? (I've never really "got" exactly what ideology is meant to be (in a rigorous sense), which is why I'm asking this question!) dan h. -- http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/chupacabras/48/ http://www.tw2.com/staff/daniel/ Ware ware Karate-do o shugyo surumonowa, Tsuneni bushido seishin o wasurezu, Wa to nin o motte nashi, Soshite tsutomereba kanarazu tasu. We who study Karate-do, Should never forget the spirit of the samurai, With peace, perseverance and hard work, We will reach our goal without failure.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005