File spoon-archives/deleuze-guattari.archive/deleuze-guattari_1998/deleuze-guattari.9812, message 304


From: "Widder,NE" <N.E.Widder-AT-lse.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: RE: Homeopathic thread is relevant; think again
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 20:06:41 -0000


I think the word you are looking for is "Uncle", so that's the way I'll
treat this.

Nathan
n.e.widder-AT-lse.ac.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: Unleesh-AT-aol.com
To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Sent: 12/16/98 6:23 PM
Subject: Re:  RE: Homeopathic thread is relevant; think again


In a message dated 12/15/98 12:17:38 PM, you wrote:

<<So ethics = categorical imperative-type test plus personal opinion.
Not
much of an ethics.  And not really different from the "I know what I
want
and know what gets in the way of it" of your previous post.  And so not
even
close to presenting a Deleuzo-Guattarian understanding of desire.

Nathan
n.e.widder-AT-lse.ac.uk>>

Perhaps this might be a more appropriate articulation :

Fuck Off

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005