From: "Widder,NE" <N.E.Widder-AT-lse.ac.uk> Subject: RE: RE: Homeopathic thread is relevant; think again Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 20:06:41 -0000 I think the word you are looking for is "Uncle", so that's the way I'll treat this. Nathan n.e.widder-AT-lse.ac.uk -----Original Message----- From: Unleesh-AT-aol.com To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Sent: 12/16/98 6:23 PM Subject: Re: RE: Homeopathic thread is relevant; think again In a message dated 12/15/98 12:17:38 PM, you wrote: <<So ethics = categorical imperative-type test plus personal opinion. Not much of an ethics. And not really different from the "I know what I want and know what gets in the way of it" of your previous post. And so not even close to presenting a Deleuzo-Guattarian understanding of desire. Nathan n.e.widder-AT-lse.ac.uk>> Perhaps this might be a more appropriate articulation : Fuck Off
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005