Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:25:45 +0000 From: Daniel Haines <daniel-AT-tw2.com> Subject: [Fwd: Re: dialogues] Unleesh-AT-aol.com wrote: > > Why are you so annoyed, Dan? I sincerely didn't like that book, and it was for > the reasons stated. I thought ol' Fred was being far too curmudgeonly and not > really Dionysian, which is the quality I like in him. If someone else likes > it, great. What were you expecting? For me to write a balanced essay in > response, fairly evaluating the book? But it doesn't interest me! If it did, I > would! What is it you are expecting? well, i wasn't expecting a "private" response, anyway. I am "annoyed" because 1) I find this an inadequate approach to - seeing as this is the example we have already - reading Nietszche, but equally to anything; I'm not saying that there are objective or external relations of truth that we must conform to, but I do think that "that doesn't interest me/ i didn't like that" is a pretty weak criteria, and one that is far too centered in the "ego"/neurotic self/a kind of narcissistic self-indulgence. -- to me that kind of approach/perspective is born out of a consumerism that reduces everything to equally appropriate consumer choices, commodifies everything and then segments the market so as to make your "choice" irrelevant - by choosing you just provide market research information.... all those paperback books on the shelves in the supermarket, same size, set range of prices, flattened into equivalence, homogenised - "take what you >like<, there is no difference..." (I'm talkin here about stratified relations within capitalist regimes of production, in extension - I'm not arguing against the fact that on the plane of immanence these texts are seperated only by thresholds and form an intensive continuum which multiplies difference... that is a different matter)... isn't this the great strategy of "late-capitalism" --> selling individuality? saying - "yeah, buy the one that you really want, the one that makes you feel good, the one that >expresses your individuality< yes >be creative<, we'll sell to you on the basis of that self-identification... sounds good doesn't it? you "like the sound of that", do you? -- but all that you could ever "buy" is fuel for your own neurotic self... a sense of lack, your own castration... an identity as a consumer is an identity in a relation to an insurmountable lack, with desire understood as lack - as "what you have not yet bought but would -- >like<-- to possess... it is, as they say, "oedipus..." sorry, but it is not a matter of indifference or pomo-pop-cultural studies liberalism to me whether people read (for example) nietszche or jackie collins... which is not to dream for a second that most people wouldn't "like" to read jackie collins over nietszche... 2) I think to engage with anything/ any thinker or writer obviously involves a process of negotiation and re-mapping; in that process you may find irreducible differences of approach/perspective, you may find omissions, breaks, passions, and anything else I could add to this list.... for me it is important to embrace this multiplicity without reducing it to a particular set - to not select only one voice from the polyvocality - - you don't like nietszhe's voices in Human, all to Human but you "like" his dionysian voices? okay - but is that a reason to tune out those human, all to human voices, to say - " i don't like this" - or is that something vital to explore? You have mentioned hyatt's "undoing yourself' frequently -- recall that he says (misquote): "whatever is in discordance with your self is your friend.... Undoing Yourself means getting rid of yourself as it is now" -- remember that "you" (and that mean's your "likes and dislikes") are only a bridge to beyond your-"self"... dan h.99 -- hey! notice the new address for machine -AT- http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Field/1030/ aeon of horus -AT- http://www.tw2.com/staff/daniel/ Ware ware Karate-do o shugyo surumonowa, Tsuneni bushido seishin o wasurezu, Wa to nin o motte nashi, Soshite tsutomereba kanarazu tasu. We who study Karate-do, Should never forget the spirit of the samurai, With peace, perseverance and hard work, We will reach our goal without failure.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005