File spoon-archives/deleuze-guattari.archive/deleuze-guattari_1999/deleuze-guattari.9901, message 462


From: Unleesh-AT-aol.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:54:03 EST
Subject: Re: Marriage for dummies


In a message dated 1/21/99 2:16:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rooney-AT-tiger.cc.oxy.edu writes:

<< To do so is to rather loosely use the term 
 "marriage", ignoring the primary, pragmatic
 stipulation differentiating it from other 
 forms of union or partnership.  But then, I
 forgot that words mean whatever unleesh says 
 they mean (q.v. "trope"). >>

Rooney, you have to be one of the most ignorant motherfuckers I've ever met.
Obviously you live in such a fucking restricted social scene, you've never
Known people who have Actually had marriages of the type I'm discussing. So
why don't you crawl back into your fucking traditional hole and quit proving
yourself to be a parochial fuck, meanwhile those who are actually Capable of
the dialogue I'm suggesting can enter in.

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005