From: michelle phil lewis king <kinglewis-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: art/capital
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 15:25:07 PDT



Daniel some Extra Vain Questions;

When art becomes suspiciously non-revolutionary which state is doing the 
suspecting?

Can the vanity of art's revolutionary appearance become, in essence, 
revolutionary?

Is the nature of this revolution vain given the state of capitalism?

Is art suspicious of capitalism or capitalism suspicious of art?

Has art become the unnoticed everyday nature of the capitalist state? Is the 
continual realisation of this nature the unique event of art?

                     Escape.

Is art as a revolutionary weapon an everyday matter of fact?

(If to become an everyday REVOLUTIONARY is to be continually and 
un-heroically suspicious to the STATE (with no relief), is to become such a 
suspect necessarily revolutionary?)

Do art's facts actually live at home?

p.(merz)


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com