Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Greg J. Seigworth" <gseigwor-AT-marauder.millersville.edu>
Subject: Re: pros & cons of the two Spinoza books



Little one, because -- if slow reading Spinoza alongside -- it's mostly
definitions of S's terminology (given the deleuze-spin of course).  Plus
its concluding essay 'Spinoza and Us' is one of Deleuze's best pieces of
writing.  Do the 'big' one afterwards.  Just a suggestion ...Greg

On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Mark Crosby wrote:

> Would anyone be willing to give a recommendation
> between the 'big' Spinoza book (Expressionism in
> Philosophy: Spinoza) compared to the 'little' Spinoza
> book (Spinoza, Practical Philosophy) -- aside from the
> cost and length -- for someone who is starting to read
> the _Ethics_ on a VERY slow part-time basis? Thanks,
> Mark
>
> --- Dan Smith <dls216-AT-psu.edu> wrote: [CUT]
> > Also, the Spinoza book to which you refer
> > is well worth, again IMO, a detailed read vis-a-vis
> > univocity (esp. WRT to that which a univocal concept
> > of Being is 'responding').
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>