Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 03:31:10 +0200
From: vroummmm <vroummmm-AT-nirvanet.net>
Subject: RE: Les Larmes de Nietzsche published by Flammarion


individually speaking,

i feel, more still, interested by deleuze and indeed. 
for instance, i like the pictures in "tombeau gilles deleuze", where he takes 
instantaneous sun shines with also the glasses (gafas) on the noze, and the 
hat, and so much in his synapses, in the rocking chair, but./i don't want to 
read the book, 4 lack of airport-time-booking, do you say, and if you have 
time; the relaxing relation R.Pinhas makes between hunters in reality, 
ie.Nietzsche or Pinhas's [documentary(?)], to my point of view I find this 
strange, that those two writer-artist (deleuze and pinhas) should be related 
in a title, already, and now, in the so, sub-lines. Is it a closed-club 
repeated version of the archaic diversion, or some, thing, like, a Hegel Body 
_with_ Organs, then a small anonymous BwO and a smoother Levinas BwO on the 
_out_ one side you enjoyed last summer, and Nietzsche BwO and Spinoza a BwO on 
the other, and Deleuze as the intercessor? Could you please say more on the 
reason you find happy with you reading off/in this book, Herv.? Please 
understand the remanent confusion raising from this quite questioning attitude 
in this message:e-mail, message, arosed from my most certainly wrong 
misconsception of Deleuze's interesting and fully curious mind.     
One more gesture from me to you would stay here to asking you, so why, this 
calling "body without organs", what so wrong with the organs actually, as 
proved by new neuroleptics and old serotonins, organs are good for the 
chakras, and this stance in plateau 6 where it says: "may be to adore the 
obstacle can be a solution for the hunter of body without organs (the blocking 
of the BwO), is it not in itself or out of itself an indication of Deleuze's 
secret aim at speeding the shape of his books in one of his 'a-metaphysical' 
style?
Thank You./please Tell me more about this book, I have no idea whatsoever 
there is in it. Love.Thanks R.Pinhas, I'll read your book later, one day./
VrOuMmMm./
///////////////////////////>Bonjour  tou(te)s///////////////////////////
///>
///> If some of you are still interested in Deleuze, have a look at a very
///>interesting, very new and very controvertial book par R.Pinhas
///>
///>"Les Larmes de Nietzsche, Deleuze et la musique"  published by Flammarion,
///>2001.  ISBN : 2 08 067814 0
///>
///>I am sorry to say its no navel gazing, but philosophy.

                                O         O
                                 ---WvW---
------------------------------o         _ _   o-----------------------------

what makes you say it is philosophy (sorry if it's a mind difficult 
question):)
///>I am also sorry to say it is in french .
///>
///>I am happy to say it is great
///>
///>Cordialement
///>
///> Herv

"the rate of ex-change of the mass-area of a particle is called the Angular Momentum of the particle about the origin, and the sum of the angular momenta of all the systems of particles is called the angular momentum of the system, all about the origin" Matter and Motion, James CLERK MAXWELL.