Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Bryant <levi_bryant-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Ground, grounded, Quality? D&R enigma


--0-1598124611-1023735133=:92672


 Which should lead you to wonder whether the relationship between the domain of difference and representation is more akin to a mobius strip than one of exclusion as your posts often suggests...  Which would explain why Deleuze does not reject identity, recognition and the rest outright, but says they are principles become.
Paul
  "B. Metcalf" <bmetcalf-AT-ultranet.com> wrote: Hi Paul,

The only thing I want to respond to is your statment: "Incidentally, you
might wish to rethink your use of "sub-representative" difference in
describing Deleuze's project. The "sub" (meaning below, underneath,
beneath) of "subrepresentative" makes your discourse sound as if it's still
tied to the logic of representation in the sense of attempting to account
for it. In articulating Deleuze's project as an attempt to get at the
subrepresentative domain of difference your language suggests that
representation is the telos of these subterranian processes."

But "Sub-representative" is not MY language. See D&R pages
56,69,178,264,267,286.....to mention just a few of the many passages where
this term is used. How have you missed it?!? 

Beth 





---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
--0-1598124611-1023735133=:92672

HTML VERSION:

Which should lead you to wonder whether the relationship between the domain of difference and representation is more akin to a mobius strip than one of exclusion as your posts often suggests...  Which would explain why Deleuze does not reject identity, recognition and the rest outright, but says they are principles become.

Paul

  "B. Metcalf" <bmetcalf-AT-ultranet.com> wrote:

Hi Paul,

The only thing I want to respond to is your statment: "Incidentally, you
might wish to rethink your use of "sub-representative" difference in
describing Deleuze's project. The "sub" (meaning below, underneath,
beneath) of "subrepresentative" makes your discourse sound as if it's still
tied to the logic of representation in the sense of attempting to account
for it. In articulating Deleuze's project as an attempt to get at the
subrepresentative domain of difference your language suggests that
representation is the telos of these subterranian processes."

But "Sub-representative" is not MY language. See D&R pages
56,69,178,264,267,286.....to mention just a few of the many passages where
this term is used. How have you missed it?!?

Beth