File spoon-archives/deleuze-guattari.archive/deleuze-guattari_2003/deleuze-guattari.0307, message 47


Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 16:19:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?ildegir=20sun?= <ildegirsun-AT-yahoo.no>


waouh! i am new. i am an alias. fili is an other alias. i am schizophrenic. i present myself: gilles deleuze and felix guattari have defeated all the unecessary contradiction remaining in psychoanalysis, a discipline of the body invented by a doctor, named Sigmund Freud, in the ninety century. These had been unsatisfactorilly coorected by Young and later, by Jacques Lacan. Other psychoanalyst have mistakingly corrected the intense work of Sigmund Freud, but it was to no avail.
 
Now in 1972, Gilles Deleuze, a philosopher, and a psychoanalist and a militant, Felix Guattari, have invented a new discipline which they said was Schizo-Anal-Isis. For fun they have called it Schizoanalysis, but they thought this name was not interesting, and was only one word. It was a word, it was not the idea. Anyway!
 
What I have to say to this list server, is that they did so because Freud, in trying to convince that lack was inscribed in the recording devices of the organism, was justifying a reconciliation with the trouble of life, such that life , in Freud's picture of it, was incompatible with itself. We might say, thus, that for both Deleuze and Guattari, Freud was actually negating life. He was a kind of Icarus or Promotheus figure, fighting life (Mora), and keeping the fire as the chieftain of some prehistoric, unevolutive specie (the psychoanalysants).
 
Freud importance in the seventies was too dangerous for evolution of the specie, to which Deleuze and Guattary were members, as in an organism. They wanted spiritual freedom, and love from the mother, and to replace the father. So they did , humoursly enough, and with attention, delicately violented the codes of civil society (what they call the social field), and they published their ideas on Freud. 
 
Some Psychoanalysit objected that this book was actually deepening the trouble of the Psychoanalysants, and troubling their resistance to Psychoanalytical disorder. They said Deleuze and Guattari wanted order, and that the schizophrenic needed disorder. They unconsciously agreed with Deleuze and Guattari when they further explained themselves, to prove them self obedient. Deleuze obeyed to Guattari by not saying he was pregnant of an other bird: One Thousand Plateaus.
 
This book was ignored by everybody. But it was also an interesting book. But nobody actually read it. It was written on the front page that people had to do other things than to read it. And thus people understood at the start, and actually this book is just a book, it's a Virgin. Nobody suspects the power, black or white, hidden in it's inner recipient structures. It's a microcosmic book where the life is outside and the world is inside. It's a contradiction which Difference and Reptition had foreseen but not totally over evaluated. So, DR is actually still outmarking the foundation of Schizophreny. The Phislosopher is a schizophren has sayd Deleuze, and Guattary did not obey.

Ny versjon av Yahoo! Messenger 
Nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt så morsom

--- StripMime Warning --  MIME attachments removed --- 
This message may have contained attachments which were removed.

Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- 
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005