Subject: PKF: Re: Pkf was more a writter than phillosopher?
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 21:59:05 +0200


Dear Alex,
Just about your comment on Hegel's philosophy. I really think it is very
important to study it, no metter it is something you agree or disagree with.
The reason for that is that his phylosophy jumped out from normal corse of
reasoning and came up to some conclusions that were clouse to the modern
maths and phisics. And that's what's very interesting about it, but people
usually rejact it, even before they read it, or those who research Hegel,
don't pay attantion to all those things that modern science has brought up.
So, in my opinion, if we rejact his philosophy in the start, we are
rejacting meybe some thoughts that could be of a great value. Specially,
because his position is another way of critic of rationalism (which
Feyerabend, of course in another way, critisised as well).
   Dunja

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex =[:0) . <pringoso-AT-hotmail.com>
To: <feyerabend-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 4:42 AM
Subject: PKF: Pkf was more a writter than phillosopher?


> Hello all
>
> When I read Vhed Meta Book named "the fly in the bottle" (I dont have the
> book now because i was poor in my MEXICO CITY student life), I could
> undestand how pillosopher and intellectuals have more richers life and
> thinkings in his COMMUN LIFE or in every day life. ORDINARY thinkings
about
> life and living was a point of analisis of work in some style o many late
> 60s thinkers, by example in Khun argumentations we can find some
> SOCIOCIAL-HISTORICAL analisis of scietific development, Feyerabend have a
> precious and nice style of wirting when he say that the RUDE AND
INADECUATED
> tools of the Logic cant help to understand many of complicated world of
> science and his products.
>
> Look, in my life personal life I have been refused 3 times in posgraduated
> schools in my country: one Masters in Phillosophy of science, one in
> SYMBOLIC ANTROPOLOGY AND ANOTHER in Phillosophy, I am not a lazy man, but
i
> cant undertstand why -by example- we have to study Hegel books about some
> aventures of some gosth trougth the story of civilization and then, saw
how
> it becomes to another think and then there are some trees and and shadows,
> slaves and masters and i dont remember what more.
>
> it was enoug for me
>
>
> By ANOTHER HAND ...I have quit my job AND I WILL HAVE SOME FREE TIME IN
THIS
> 2 moths, please take a look at my thesis and make happy telling me your
> opinion is in here
> --->  http://members.tripod.co.uk/pringer/page_marranoidhs_2.htm
>
> --------------
>
>
>    __________________________________________________
>    __________________________________________________
>
>       Alex los invita a conocer sus pginas en:
>
>          http://members.tripod.co.uk/pringus
>                            y
>          http://members.tripod.co.uk/pringer
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> **********************************************************************
> Contributions: mailto:feyerabend-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Commands: mailto:majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> Requests: mailto:feyerabend-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>

**********************************************************************
Contributions: mailto:feyerabend-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Commands: mailto:majordomo-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Requests: mailto:feyerabend-approval-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu