From: "Lita Coucher" <lita_coucher-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: too long or too fast? Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:11:03 -0500 I agree that with the arrival of the internet culture, attentions spans are shorter and greedier...more in less time. That said, I have a question of my own related to tempo. I just saw "Ran" for the first time last night. I noticed that while the film overall moved at a slower pace, the tempo of individual scenes varied from very, very slow to very, very quick. I get the feeling that this was meant to mimic the pace of war (wait for battle, then over quickly), which shaped the Samurai lives. Any thoughts? Jenna ----- Original Message ----- From: rutger h cornets de groot <cornets-AT-yahoo.com> To: <film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: too long or too fast? > It seems that the worst thing that can be said about a > movie nowadays is that it is too long or to slow. For > years, I used to object to that notion, simply because > there are many excellent movies that are long and > slow. Seeing some of these classic movies again for > the second or third time, however, I find I have to > admit to a certain kind of discomfort. They actually > *do* take long! And I am not just talking Bergman or > Antonioni here, I'm talking Taxi Driver, The Shining, > and many other great movies that had me poised on the > edge of my seat when I first saw them. Paradoxically > said, I can't keep up with that pace anymore. If you > can't believe me, go check for yourself. > It's not that these movies are no good anymore, they > can still be watched and enjoyed. They're great > movies. It's just that you can't make movies like that > anymore. There is a need for speed. > Last night at the Film Festival in Rotterdam, I've > found that this need for speed has brought about a new > way of film making altogether. In Miike Takashi's > latest, the action packed 'City of Lost Souls', > virtually every scene is interrupted, even before we > know what's going on. Men approach each other, they > take out their guns, start shooting and <CUT!> it's > time for another scene again. It's like we don't even > want to know anymore. > The style of shooting and editing is called Manga and > it's very much like Oriental cooking: a lot of > preparation and only a few seconds of actual cooking > in very hot oil. I will admit that I liked it a lot. > It is wild. It's like a drug. But I also regret not > being able to appreciate the old tempo anymore. And I > am wondering where this is going to end. How fast can > we go? Soon, we'll wind up having an essentially empty > screen, a blur, a painting. Then, finally, time, that > silly factor that cinema is so dependent of, will play > no role anymore. > Comments? > > ====> APROPOS - Rutger H Cornets de Groot, Writer, Translator > English-Dutch Freelance Translation Services > Essays on Film, Art, Literature, Philosophy > a p r o p o s > http://sites.netscape.net/aproposr/apropos > cornets-AT-xs4all.nl / cornets-AT-yahoo.com > "The quality of a good translation can never be captured by the original". > > __________________________________________________ > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005