From: "Lita Coucher" <lita_coucher-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: suffering sufferer suffers
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 12:34:56 -0500


Gary,
I love that postscript quote...it seems appropriate right now!
Jenna
----- Original Message ----- 
From: gary patrick norris <ngary2-AT-qwest.net>
To: <film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: suffering sufferer suffers


> >
> >Is a rose by another name still a rose?
> 
> not if it's a bromeliad on a coffee table that someone wants
> to call a rose.  The re-presentation is not the thing...although
> it may be the rub.
> 
> 
> gary
> 
> 
> 
> ps-still not very happy with the interpretation of romanticism.
> see s lockhart's post for the most recent...
> --
> Every visible power is threatened, especially when it
> rests on a usurpation that alienates both its victims
> and its accomplices.  Thus the detective's tactics are
> those of the minister and the Chief of State.  Power will
> be shady or will not be at all. . .
>      --H de Balzac, Introduction to Une tenebreuse affaire
> 
> 
>      --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
> 


     --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---