From: "Lita Coucher" <lita_coucher-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Traffic Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 11:02:40 -0500 Wow, this guy did NOT like "Traffic." THanks, Hugh. I'm grounded and looking for entertainment...the pessimist...prepare for the worst, right? Jenna ----- Original Message ----- From: hugh bone <hbone-AT-optonline.net> To: <film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:57 AM Subject: Traffic > > Jenna, > > For a negative review: > > http://www.sfbg.com/AandE/35/14/heavy.html > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> > > > > On another topic, has anyone seen "Traffic?" I'm very intrigued, but need > > an honest opinion. Don't want to be a victim of my own epxectations. > > > > thanks, > > jenna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Lita Coucher <lita_coucher-AT-hotmail.com> > > > To: <film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> > > > Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 3:42 PM > > > Subject: Re: What's wrong with mainstream sensibilities? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LC, > > > > > > > > > > Not to be finicky about words, > > > > > > > > Hugh, > > > > PLEASE be finicky about words. That's what I'm trying to figure out! > > > > > > > > but your illustration seems to be > > > > > > > > > > 1) a contrast of feeling, emotion, one's personal reaction to, and > > > > enjoyment > > > > > of a movie, vs. > > > > > > > > > > 2) logical definition of its story, characters, cinematography > etc., > > > and > > > > > how they relate to each other. > > > > > > > > > > Two people may not agree about the emotional impact of a scene, a > > > segment > > > > or > > > > > the entire movie, but are likely to agree about the facts > > > > > of item 2. > > > > > > > > Yes. I agree. I'm in a bind about seperating emotional response from > > the > > > > functionality of the devices used to illicit that response. > > > > lc > > > > > > > > > > HB > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And about what Lita was asking... I think in some cases it's > more > > > > > > important > > > > > > > to have opinions than to analyze. I, mean, you can understand > > > > something > > > > > > and > > > > > > > still don't like it. I remember an article by a music critic of > > the > > > > New > > > > > > York > > > > > > > Times saying just that... that he understood Schoenberg but > still > > > > didn't > > > > > > > like him. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right. My example of this is "Fight Club." I really found it > > > > distasteful > > > > > > and grotesque, but i recognized it's value as a film. I enjoyed > > > getting > > > > > > into the themes, subplot, etc. Film is such a subjective realm, i > > > think > > > > > > it's almost impossible to seperate completely the opinion from the > > > > > analysis. > > > > > > It's difficult, at the very least. > > > > > > > > > > > > LC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > > Manuel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > > > > > > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list film-theory-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005