Date: Fri, 25 Nov 1994 10:34:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Stephen Katz <SKATZ-AT-TrentU.ca> To: foucault-AT-world.std.com Subject: Re: Surveillance and discipline Books such as John Tagg's _The Burden of Representation_ have attemted to trace the intervention of photography into forms of ruling. That would be Foucault's angle as well, not what cameras etc. can do "in the present" in terms of discipline as much as questioning how did technologies of visibility enter into the problematization of making power economical and efficient. Why taping here and not there. What were, are, the resistances to making subjects visible, recordable, calculable, stable, etc. What happens when, as in the Rodney King case, other subjects join the game of recording and democratically challenge those who control visible-power. In other words, I think we're dealing with more than just the cops having new toys in catching out the robbers. Stephen Katz, Trent University.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005