From: "Michael Bartos" <MBARTOS-AT-bunyip.bhs.mq.edu.au> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:41:51 GMT+10 Subject: Miller and the gay Foucault For me, the problem with Miller is not so much that the account sensationalises Foucualt's sex life, but that it somewhat spuriously conjoins a biographical account with a philosophical account, in his thesis that all Foucault's work can be seen as a pursuit of the 'limit experience'. The politics of this argument need to be exposed: a gay life is a life lived towards death, or SM=AIDS. Otherwise, though, there is the question of whether Foucault needs necessarily to be understood as a gay man. There may be some connections between Foucault's gayness and his writings, and these connections are the stuff of which biography is made. But it would be a mistake, I think, to try to understand, for example, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, in tems of its gay author. Foucualt's problematization of the sciences of man ought to make us suspicious of any arguments that seek to rely on understanding 'the whole person' in relation to their work (or anything else). While it is fun to be able to install Foucault in the pantheon of gay philosophers (and debate his comparative rank to Wittgenstein's) it is about as useful to using his work as is the debate over whether Heidegger was a Nazi! ---------------------------------------- Michael Bartos Research Fellow National Centre in HIV Social Research Macquarie University NSW 2109 Australia email: michael.bartos-AT-mq.edu.au ph: +61 2 850 8039 fax: +61 2 850 8112 ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005