Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 14:43:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Karen Kolodenko <kkolode-AT-emory.edu> Subject: Re: What is Power? This is interesting and helpful except for one thing - I don't get how there can be intentions without subjects. What are "imbedded" intentions? To whom or what are they attributed? Perhaps my confusion is stemming from a cultural obsession with a cohesive, bound self, whereas to Foucault, the self isn't a heuristic concept in this case, and intentions are as diffuse and elusive as power...? -Karen Kolodenko kkolode-AT-emory.edu On Tue, 1 Aug 1995 CCOLWELL-AT-ucis.vill.edu wrote: > Re: Power as intentional and non-subjective, see History of Sexuality, I > pp 92-6 > Power is intentional to the extent that there are intentions imbedded > in power relations, e.g.,heterosexual or patriarchal intentions imbedded > in most if not all institutions in this country. It is non-subjective tot > the extent that there is no subject to which origin or responsibility > can be assigned for these intentions. The effects of our 'actions' > (conceived as broadly as possible) not only escape or intentions but > generate effects of power to which we can ascribe, or simply perceive, > intentions. Indeed, if F coherently argues that subjects are the effects > of power/knowledge relations then power relations must be non-subjective. > ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005