Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 01:54:34 -0600 From: jlnich1-AT-service1.uky.edu (jln) Subject: Re: Capitalism and Justice >I have to admit that I have read quite a bit of Foucault's work, and I >haven't seen anything in it that suggested to me that Foucault was a >"philosopher who denies human agency," although I would concede that >agency is not a concept that fits well into the agenda of _The Order >of Things_. On the other hand, perhaps that is one reason why >Foucault's thought shifts TOWARD a focus on agency (as it seems to me >to do) starting with "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History." > >Steve. It seems to me that Foucault doesn't wsant to deny agency but rather that he wants to think of thinks for a change in terms other than aganecy. AK is about looking at texts without looking at intent: how could they come about, under what circumstances. This does not deny agency but puts it to the side. What Foucault is interested in is how the possibilities are limited for agents: what determines a set of possible actions for this agent in this circumstance? THe action is never determined (see Subject and Power, and Hoy's article in his Critical Reader of Foucault), but a set of possible actions. THe agent, presumably, then acts in one of those ways as s/he determines. JLN jlnich1-AT-pop.uky.edu Department of Philosophy University of Kentucky Lexington, KY. 40509
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005