From: brehkopf-AT-nexus.yorku.ca Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 09:26:47 -0400 Subject: Re: Human Rights / Foucault In your message of 12:51 Jul 31 1996, you write: > Dear Blaine, > > Of course I am not suggesting this is the case. > > You know the Karl case. After I received a mail from Keskinf-AT-boun.edu.tr > who invites people to discus on Foucault, I thought that it was a good > means to turn back to Foucault by a question like mine. > > But the important point was the world-wide relevancy of the question; not > the hunger strikes per se. I never thought that intellectuals, > whatever it means, can be held responsible for the deaths. But i think > they are responsible for the quetions. And who can claim that the quetion > of human rights with reference to Foucault's euvre is a not that > important one. > > I love your message and appreciate your sincerety. > > Peace > > Koray Caliskan > Dept. of Political Sci. (RA/ Grad. stu.) Thanks Koray. You are correct, of course, about the relevance of Foucault here. Hopefully some enlightening discussion will emerge from this real-life tragedy. I guess I'm just feeling a bit overwhelmed by what continues to happen in the world; combine that with my own sense of inadequacy in the face of it all and it's a potent blend of frustration and guilt on my part. But we must continue to write and speak just the same, for what it's worth. I wish you the best in your efforts and commend your willingness to speak out. Peace, Blaine --
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005