From: "Gabriel Ash" <Gabriel.Ash.1-AT-nd.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 96 23:28:09 Subject: Re: The Nature of Power. On Mon, 19 Aug 1996 08:35:57 +0000, malcolmt-AT-eznet.ca wrote: > >I guess my point is that it's perhaps not necessary to choose between >one and the other - i.e. whether Foucault analyses social formations >or formations of the social. Approaching Foucault from one >perspective permits observations not possible from the other, and >vice versa. So perhaps it's more a question of "both/and" rather than >"either/or". > >Hmm. Any thoughts? I guess this is just right. And it applies more generally. Perhaps an earlier and important example of this kind of thing-process duality is Durkheim's 'social fact' which is 'fait social' - both a fact and a past perfect of the verb to do. that which has been done. ------------- Gabriel Ash Notre-Dame -------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005