Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 23:29:05 -0600 (CST) From: Stephane Charitos <scharits-AT-msuvx2.memphis.edu> Subject: Re: A Preface to Transgression >It may be that Foucault isn't really proposing a transgressive method, >but rather a language of transgression. For example, he speaks of "the >impossibility of attributing the millenary language of dialectics to the >major experience that sexuality forms for us." It is possible, however, >to speak of sexuality in the language of transgression because, as >Foucault contends, the appearance of sexuality marks the transformation >of man as worker into man as one who speaks. >The language of transgression is a way of speaking of the way philosophy >"experiences itself and its limits in language and in this transgression >of language which carries it...to the faltering of the speaking >subject." In short, a "communication with communication" rather than a >philosophical method per se. >Then again, it's been a while since I've sat down and read "Preface to >Transgression" thoroughly. I just thought I'd flip through it and throw >out what I could muster. It is quite likely I have no idea what I am >talking about. I think it is always necessary to remember when discussing the Preface to Transgression the context within which it appeared: a special issue of Critique dedicated to Georges Bataille who had just passed away. It is against the backdrop of Bataille's texts that one must read the Preface; as a kind of dialogue with Bataille's idea of the impossibility of communication, or rather of the impossibility of a continuous communication. For B. true communication can only be experienced as an intense but fleeting moment at the limit of language (of organized language), at the point where sense topples into nonsense, where language (the language of sense) is so tortured that it parts and momentarily reveals its unspeakable other, to the point where the conscience of the thinking (and speaking) subject falters and imploses. To this fleeting experience B. gave various names: laughter, tears, poetry, sacrifice, eroticism...one can add if one wishes transgression to that list. Within these limits one can talk of a *language* of transgression, or of a philosophy of transgression if one understands by that a practice which forces philosophy (or language) to acknowledge that which it cannot acknowledge. One is reminded here of Sade who in "La Philosophie dans le Boudoir" brings philosophy onto a terrain where it has to acknowledge and coexist with its absolute opposite, pornography. cheers stephane
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005