Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 22:58:50 -0500 (EST) From: John Sproule <jsproule-AT-usit.net> Subject: Re: Power and Neutrality At 02:11 PM 2/9/97 -0800, Miles Jackson wrote: <my prior post deleted> >How is what psychotherapists do like Foucault's work? Perhaps >I am simplifying, but isn't most therapy more or less hermeneutics-- >looking for the "deep" meaning beneath the surface? This search for >the underlying meaning of things like language and discourse is exactly >the philosophical viewpoint that Foucault rails against in most of his >books (see esp. arch. of knowledge). For Foucault, psychotherapy is >a social practice and related discourse that we need to analyze (to >understand, for instance, how various psychological types of individuals >are produced in our society). I don't see how psychotherapy could be >something that mirrors, say, Foucault's history of sexuality without >undermining the guiding assumptions of therapeutic practice/discourse. > >Miles Jackson >cqmv-AT-odin.cc.pdx.edu >mjackson-AT-zeus.cc.pcc.edu > What I had in mind when I compared psychotherapy to Foucault's work is the general process of trying to understand the forces in one's life that have shaped one's personality or character. For example, the "politics of the family", to borrow a term from the title of one of RD Laing's books, would be representative of the forces that I was thinking of. The parallel I saw was around this project of trying to understand a person's history in terms of the micro-powers that have been most active in his or her life. I don't dispute Foucault's point that the process of psychotherapy, itself, can be part of the powers that need to be examined. But this seems similiar to the issue of whether Foucault's own work also needs to be reflected upon as part of the very Knowlege/Power processes that he is trying to analyse and bring more to light. John Sproule
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005