Date: Sun, 06 Apr 1997 14:02:11 +0000 From: John Evans Treat <treatje-AT-ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu> Subject: Re: Subjectivization ***Warning: Newbie Post*** On 6 Apr 97, Doug Henwood wrote: > If > morality shouldn't be communal, then why wouldn't it be moral for me > to kill you? Or gouge out the eye of a passerby? Not in the legal > sense, since obviously both would be felonies, but in the > moral/ethical sense. Nietzsche might not have a problem with > answering this, since there's one morality for slaves and another > for masters. Presumably most of us don't accept that. I wonder whether Nietzsche could ask, Why would one *want* to do this -- especially given that by doing so one would weaken oneself, since one would then be forever vulnerable to revenge, punishment? Hardly a position of power. Doesn't real mastery also involve self-possession and restraint? If you and I feel aggression toward one another, can't we joyously affirm it and agree to transcend that, and thus both become more powerful? I'm reminded of Gilgamesh and Enkidu -- now *there* was a friendship. Does N. anywhere refer to that epic? I can't recall. Best regards, John
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005