Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 08:48:01 +0100 From: ccw94-AT-aber.ac.uk (COLIN WIGHT) Subject: Re: How to (conf)oose boundaries" (1 easy step) Steve wrote: > >In any case, the question of "how one chooses what boundaries are >worth transgressing" is not a difficult one for Foucault. One >examines the situation, possibly deliberates, weighs the pros and cons >of one course of action or another, perhaps discusses it with others, >and finally makes a choice (or delays, and chooses later). Having >done so, one checks to see whether the outcome of the choice was >desirable or undesirable, or a little of both. Presumably one >thereafter takes the experience into account. (I assume that one is >taking the trouble to choose, whereas usually one acts according to >habit). > >Nothing innovative here. Foucault's innovation in ethics, if there is >one (which there isn't), is to say: there is no piece of information >about human beings (their purpose, their genes, what is normal among >them, what aids their survival, what makes them happy, what they >desire deep down) that can settle the ethical -- or moral, or >political -- questions that arise in their lives. This is because, he >says, "the self is not given," which Foucault calls "Sartre's >theoretical insight." From this premise, he concludes: we must >create our selves "as works of art." OK, now I get it, this is a straight foward positivism, non? With a strong a priori commitment to 'Hume's Fork'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Colin Wight Department of International Politics University of Wales, Aberystwyth Aberystwyth SY23 3DA --------------------------------------------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005