Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 09:34:36 +0100 From: ccw94-AT-aber.ac.uk (COLIN WIGHT) Subject: Re: Silence As a non-silent participant (although what i haven't said - the silences - may have been more coherent) I suppose I should say something. All the stuff on surveillance and panopticism (look at Discipline and Punish) would seem to be relevant, but it seems to me you might want to also look at Spivak on this also, especially 'Can the Subaltern Speak?'. Also, if I remember rightly, the discussion betwteen Foucault and assembled others called the 'confession of the flesh' does touch, very briefly, on the subject of silence. (its in Power/Knowledge, Colin Gordon (ed.) Obviously, silence is an ambigous notion. But I am not sure (and i am not trying to pick a fight here) John's example really constitutes a victory for the heroine, and even if it is it seems an, at best, ironic one. Suicide, i presume, would have achieved the same result. I suppose we can redescribe every defeat as a victory of sorts: the condemned man/woman commits suicide and cheats the system of its revenge; the army was not defeated it simply asserted it right not to fight any longer, and in so doing denied the opposing army of its wish for a battle; The tortured man/woman asserts their right not to talk and gets beaten to death; I go silently into the night because..... Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Colin Wight Department of International Politics University of Wales, Aberystwyth Aberystwyth SY23 3DA --------------------------------------------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005