Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 11:18:55 EST From: gcb0-AT-Lehigh.EDU (Gordon Bearn) Subject: Re: undergrad texts rob L wrote: >I think that the _Archaeology_ is Foucault's unsuccessful attempt to codify >what he was doing. It is vague on some of the most important >theoretical/methodological issues of his work, e.g. the definition of the >"statement". He says what it is not, but never exactly what it is. > >_Discipline and Punish_ and _The Order of Things_ are better. Also, for >undergrads, the elusive but interesting essay "What is Enlightenment?" and >some of the essays contained in the volume _Power/Knowledge_. > >Rob > i personally rather like AK especially the way it slips the statement between empiricism and rationalims...between skinner and chomsky? arriving at a place that smells like wittgenstein's kitchen....or austin's pantry....but "never exactly what it is" reminds me of derrida's critique of austin...and suddenly i wonder if you could run a derridean critique of Ak along similar lines.......which sounds like a novel way to bring these two together....without recycling some form of their descartes and madness debate.....has anybody started putting that soup together? gordon
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005