File spoon-archives/foucault.archive/foucault_1998/foucault.9807, message 94


Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:17:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert F Carley <carley+-AT-pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: illegality and intolerability (fwd)


Me again,

You can also go the Birmingham School Route (in the mid-late 1970's).  The
seminal work being, _Policing the Crisis, Mugging the State_  Hall, Stuart
et al.

Others will be able to offer you a less narrow trajectory.

Regards--  



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:14:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert F Carley <carley+-AT-pitt.edu>
To: foucault-AT-lists.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: illegality and intolerability

Hello Eric-

Depending on your interest, there is an ostensible geneaology set off by
Foucault and Deleuze in their discussion, "Intellectuals and Power" in
_Language, counter-memory, practice:  selected essays and interviews_.
Translated from the French by Donald F.  Bouchard and Sherry Simon.
>From (against) this, Spivak launches her seminal, "Can the Subaltern
Speak?" which leads to the School of Subaltern Studies (Gupta, Spivak).

Others in this Vein, James C. Scott (_Weapons of the Weak_); Basch et al.
_Nations Unbound_.  

Categorically, this should take you through the subaltern school into
discussions of hegemony, conscent, etc.  Or, at least that is where it
would take me.

Best of luck,
R

________________
Robert F. Carley
Graduate Student 
Department of English
University of Pittsburgh
carley+-AT-pitt.edu

On Thu, 16 Jul 1998 embuck1-AT-pop.uky.edu wrote:

> I guess I did not say enough about these two concepts to draw any response.
> Foucault is often accused of critiquing power and institutions, but of never
> providing a constructive alternative.  In Discipline and Punish, Foucault
> very briefly discusses illegality, almost in a tone of advocating deliberate
> illegality to overcome the application of disciplinary correction.  I say
> "almost" because I am not yet sure he did advocate such an approach.  In an
> interview in Power/Knowledge, he mentions the Gulag question in terms of
> intolerability.  Is this an inchoate tool for resistance?  This is the sort
> of thing I am trying to work out.  Has anyone seen any work on these areas?
> Can you point me to other mentions of them in Foucault?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> 



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005