From: "tony auguste" <ahma-AT-btinternet.com> Subject: Re: Baudrillard's seduction Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 02:37:14 -0000 To paraphrase a phrase: Those that can, do. Those that can't, criticise. Those that can't criticise, criticise criticism. ---------- > From: Ian Robert Douglas <Ian_Robert_Douglas-AT-Brown.edu> > To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > Subject: Re: Baudrillard's seduction > Date: 26 October 1998 20:57 > > Matthew, > your thoughts reminded me of another sentiment expressed by Deleuze, > from 'A Portrait of Foucault', in _Negotiations_. He writes, "The > objections people make, even the questions they pose, always come from a > safe ashore, and they're like lumps of mud flung at you to knock you down > and stop you getting anywhere rather than any help: objections always come > from lazy, mediocre people, as Foucault knew better than anyone." It's > been remarked that toward the end of the 1970's Foucault was expressing his > weariness with his duties at the College de France. No doubt he was also > tired, at times, of constantly having to explain himself. An instance > comes to mind--I forget where I read it--where Foucault tells of a filmaker > dropping by in Paris, to visit. They shared some wine and some food, and > talked no more than 20 minutes in 8 hours. I wonder whether it was more > out of respect for the enigma of the world that Foucault would remain > silent to his critics. The more ludricrous ones clearly angered him; and > his response could be vicious. Steiner is a definate example (from 1971), > but there's also Foucault's response to Lawrence Stone's essay in the _New > York Review of Books_ (in 1983). > But it doesn't seem to me that Baudrillard is lazy. He would seem in a > different category to some of the hack critics who were barely worth > responding to. I would even say that Baudrillard, in certain ways, is more > worthy of a response than Derrida. For sure Derrida's hardly lazy either, > but the force of his critique doesn't seem to me nearly as 'productive'--a > word we must use with care--as Baudrillard's. > > _____________________________________________________ > Ian Robert Douglas, > Associate Lecturer & Fulbright Fellow, > Watson Institute of International Studies, > Brown University, Box 1831, > 130 Hope Street, > Providence, RI 02912 > > tel: 401 863-2420 > fax: 401 863-2192 > > "Is there something 'dangerous' in Foucault's thought > that also explains the passion it continues to arouse?" > - "Dangerous, yes, because there's a violence in Foucault. > An intense violence, mastered, controlled, and turned > into courage." - Gilles Deleuze > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005