From: "" <mthrond-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Bad Writing? Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 15:43:02 PST Heidegger, for example, shouldn't be readily >comprehensible. He assumed a great deal of background knowledge in his work: >who can blame him. And when he is bastardised to suit the purposes of a >wider audience I can't help but feel that something serious is missing. You're quite right, although wouldn't you say that he made quite a nasty habit of "bastardizing" himself--in rectoral addresses, student newspapers, and the like? Just asking. MT >From owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Thu Feb 18 05:29:52 1999 >Received: from [128.143.200.198] by hotmail.com (1.1) with SMTP id MHotMailB89560CCF1DBD1017077808FC8C609870; Thu Feb 18 05:29:52 1999 >Received: (from domo-AT-localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) id HAA41637 for foucault-outgoing; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 07:42:56 -0500 >X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender to owner-foucault-AT-localhost using -f >Received: from remus.clara.net (remus.clara.net [195.8.69.79]) by lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA69792 for <foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 07:42:48 -0500 >Received: from gtpgsre (du-029-0057.claranet.co.uk [195.8.87.57]) > by remus.clara.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA07175 > for <foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:37:52 GMT > (envelope-from Stuart.Elden-AT-clara.co.uk) >Message-ID: <011501be5b3b$7552a0a0$d95708c3-AT-gtpgsre.brunel.ac.uk> >From: "Stuart Elden" <Stuart.Elden-AT-clara.co.uk> >To: <foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> >Subject: Re: Bad Writing? >Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:24:24 -0000 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3007.0 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3007.0 >Sender: owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu > >Quentin, > >Thanks for this response. I think you're being entirely sensible here, and I >guess my response to the Bad Writing mail was perhaps overly polemical. But >it does make me annoyed. The implicit assumption of those who judge this is >that this thought SHOULD be readily understood. Clearly the proposer of >Bhabha didn't know his Foucault: whose fault is that? Is it Bhabha's? Did >the reader of Butler understand Althusser, Gramsci and their critique? >Should writers have to clarify everything they write about before pushing >forward? Why waste valuable words on something that many people will fast >forward through to get to the heart of the original thought? How many people >read Bhabha or Butler as an introduction? There are plenty of books doing >that purpose. > >But yes, I agree there is an 'occluded middle here'. I've spent a lot of >time working on Foucault and Heidegger particularly, and found the going >tough at the outset. Now it's still difficult, but the difficulty is of >another level. I admit to being a bit of purist, and thinking that there is >no substitute for hard work. >Similarly Foucault. Particularly on the issue of space (one of my key >interests), there is a lot of simplifying material that does him no service >at all. It's a primary motive of my thesis to force people to realise that >using Foucault on space is NOT simple, that it must be attentive to the >tensions in his work, his use of Heidegger etc. > >An American professor friend suggested that I should write a book that >showed the Heideggerian roots of Foucault's thought, so that Foucauldians >'need not read any more Heidegger'. I'm not sure that's what I want to do - >though he is probably right that there is a market for such a book. Rather, >I would like to write a book that shows the Heideggerian roots of Foucault's >thought, so that Foucauldians want to go back to Heidegger for enriched >understandings, and critical distance from my own take. > >But, that doesn't mean it needs to be willfully obscure. I hope that my work >is comprehensible to those prepared to make a little effort. > >Best wishes > >Stuart > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005