Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 15:47:48 +1000 From: Sebastian Gurciullo <sebtempo-AT-silas-1.cc.monash.edu.au> Subject: literature/madness Does anyone have any ideas on the connection which Foucault makes between literature and madness. I am thinking in particular of the appendix to the second french edition (which went in along with "My body, this paper, this fire"), "Madness, the absence of the work"? I am particularly interested in the idea Foucault raises, not just here but elsewhere, of certain "mad" writers who are dismissed or misunderstood in their own times but who later come to be understood as responsible for some kind of literary novelty or breakthrough. The case of Roussel comes to mind here. Considering many of Foucault's early essays were so concerned with various kinds of Unreason and transgression, what are the connections between literature, madness, and the aesthetics of Foucault's own textual performance in Histoire de la folie? It would be hard to believe that such a self-conscious stylist, and one who came to make the theme of self-stylisation in life as much as in works such a central theme of his later writings was not already attempting such a performative dimension in his early texts. Remember the concluding pages to the introduction of the Archaeology of Knowledge, and the (in)famous comments about preparing "a labyrinth into which I can venture" and which presumably those who seek to discover what Foucault was on about must also risk. What retrospective effect could this statement have regarding not so much Foucault's "position" on madness (which would presume that Foucault actually had only one, or a resolved view that was self-identical to itself) but his performance, what he does with regard to the problematic that has been raised. I don't think it would be so much a case of "writing madly", as if there were some kind of peculiar and self-evident style which can be described as "mad" writing, but of the kind of transitions in ideas and thinking, and the status that they seek to present with regard to themselves, as they occur in Foucault's text. If for Descartes, madness is certainty, and reason is the capacity to doubt one's senses in a continuous manner (my body, this paper, this fire), is Foucault rational or mad (especially, but not only, when he claims to be writing with a view to madness itself), or is his writing, the space it seeks to occupy, somewhere else altogether, neither strictly mad nor rational and for that reason already risking the boundary that would relegate it as mad, or (less polemically and with Derrida) a failed application of reason? I would like to follow up these points myself but don't know French and so, for the moment, the question of trying to follow the aesthetics of Foucault's own (con)textual practice (and its wider ramifications) in Histoire de la folie remains barred to me. Maybe I should learn French, but perhaps someone can help? cheers sebastian
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005