File spoon-archives/foucault.archive/foucault_2000/foucault.0003, message 20


From: TekUtopia-AT-aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 19:09:13 EST
Subject: Re: Deontology v. Utilitarianism


In a message dated 02/29/2000 23:03:55 EST, TriscitMan-AT-aol.com writes:

<< What are some reasons to use a deontological framework to make policy over 
 that of a utility framework? >>

It always perplexes me that people assume that this is an either/or decision. 
"You don't like John Stuart Mill's ethics? Ah! Then you must be a 
deontologist!"

Personally, I've read both sides and don't think either extreme is very wise. 
Absolute ethics determined in any categorical sense can cause very bad 
decisions. On the one hand, Utilitarianism could justify mass genocide in the 
name of population control (greatest good for greatest number), whereas 
deontology could justify telling nazis where Jews are hiding (yeah, I know, 
this example is a cliche). Situations change and people change. Categorical 
attempts to fit the entire universe of decisions into a little "logical" 
human framework are destined to be problematic.

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005