File spoon-archives/foucault.archive/foucault_2000/foucault.0004, message 3


Subject: RE: biopower: Agamben/Foucault.  
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 00:52:31 -0400


I heard Professor Wlad Godzich of the University of Geneva give a brilliant
paper on this very topic.  I cannot attempt to summarize it; perhaps you
should write to Godzich for a copy.  PAB


Paul A. Bové
Editor,
boundary 2, an international journal
	of literature and culture
Professor of English
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA   15260
email:  bove-AT-pitt.edu
fax:  412-624-6639
phone:  412-624-6523


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
[mailto:owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu]  On Behalf Of Catherine
Mills
Sent:	Friday, April 07, 2000 1:15 AM
To:	foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Subject:	biopower: Agamben/Foucault.

Hi,

I have recently been doing some work on biopower, particularly using
Giorgio Agamben's book called 'Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life'.
In the introduction to this book, Agamben claims that Foucault
overemphasises the historical distinction between sovereignty and
biopolitics and goes on to argue that 'the inclusion of bare life
[Aristotle's zoe] constitutes the original - if concealed - nucleus of
sovereign power...the production of the biopolitical body is the original
activity of sovereign power' (p6).  I would be interested to know what
other people who have read this book think of Agamben's critique of
Foucault and of his own arguments regarding biopower, especially around the
generalisation of the exception in modern politics.

Thanks,  Catherine


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005