File spoon-archives/foucault.archive/foucault_2000/foucault.0004, message 5


Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 18:01:49 +1000
Subject: RE: biopower: Agamben/Foucault.  



Paul, thanks for this reference.  I will try to get in touch and get a copy.

Catherine

At 12:52 AM 4/7/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I heard Professor Wlad Godzich of the University of Geneva give a brilliant
>paper on this very topic.  I cannot attempt to summarize it; perhaps you
>should write to Godzich for a copy.  PAB
>
>
>Paul A. Bov
>Editor,
>boundary 2, an international journal
>	of literature and culture
>Professor of English
>University of Pittsburgh
>Pittsburgh, PA   15260
>email:  bove-AT-pitt.edu
>fax:  412-624-6639
>phone:  412-624-6523
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: 	owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>[mailto:owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu]  On Behalf Of Catherine
>Mills
>Sent:	Friday, April 07, 2000 1:15 AM
>To:	foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Subject:	biopower: Agamben/Foucault.
>
>Hi,
>
>I have recently been doing some work on biopower, particularly using
>Giorgio Agamben's book called 'Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life'.
>In the introduction to this book, Agamben claims that Foucault
>overemphasises the historical distinction between sovereignty and
>biopolitics and goes on to argue that 'the inclusion of bare life
>[Aristotle's zoe] constitutes the original - if concealed - nucleus of
>sovereign power...the production of the biopolitical body is the original
>activity of sovereign power' (p6).  I would be interested to know what
>other people who have read this book think of Agamben's critique of
>Foucault and of his own arguments regarding biopower, especially around the
>generalisation of the exception in modern politics.
>
>Thanks,  Catherine
>
>
>

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005