From: "MRFanning" <MRFanning-AT-email.msn.com> Subject: RE: hello scholars! Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:20:35 -0400 -----Original Message----- From: owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu [mailto:owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu]On Behalf Of Jonathan Keesecker Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 2:07 AM To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Subject: hello scholars! hello, i'm sorry to burst into your listserve uninvited, but i was hoping to find some help. when i stumbled across it some time ago i was impressed with everyone's knowledge of foucault and kept it as a bookmark for future reference. basically, i've read very little of foucault's writing, although i've read some secondary stuff as well as others' which has benifited from foucault. i'd like to break into reading foucault himself, but i'm not sure what i should begin with. i considered madness, but decided against it because it was early (i thought his writing might be more clear in later works). so i considered discipline, but was uncertain about that because it was so much later and might take for granted the reader's knowledge of his work. i began archaeology because i understood it to be the closest thing to an explanation of a methodology, A couple of good secondary sources: _Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics_ by H.L.Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow _Foucault: A Critical Reader_ edited by D.C.Hoy I'm sure there are others, but these two do address methodology and might give you some ideas about what you'd like to read of Foucault to get to that in addition to Archaelogy of Knowledge. but some portions were fairly difficult and i've heard that sheridan smith's english translation is pretty shady. finally, i considered rabinow's foucault reader, I think the Reader is a fair place to start, a lot of it's exerpted sections from some of the larger works, like Discipline and Punish, plus you have some shorter things in the same volume, like "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History," that make nice companion readings. but while those who are familiar with foucault say that it is simple and good for a mere introduction, those who are not familiar with him already say that it is difficult. i was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. while i've read only portions of foucault's actual writing, i am somewhat familiar with the major themes of postmodernity. my background is philosophy, but i've also read on such foucault-influinced subjects as the New Historicism of literary theory. basically, i believe i have enough foundation to get into foucault, i'm just wondering where i should start. i'd appreciate any advice/response at all. thanks! jonathan f. keesecker ps. what about power/knowledge? i've read portions and it seemed not too unclear, but i've heard it can be difficult. _ I was going to suggest Power/Knowledge, and Politics, Philosophy, Culture. They can be difficult, but, for me at least, they often helped understand things in the other books. History of Sexuality I is also a good place to start too. It's short and there's a lot in it. Best of luck with it. Regards, Robert Fanning _______________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005