From: JBCM2-AT-aol.com Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:14:13 EDT Subject: Re: Lynne Cheney's views on Foucault it seems to me that some things are painfully obvious, and that Lynn Cheney, along with the rest of the right-wing conservatives who make a living attacking intellectuals -- there's a long history of this -- is among the most obvious. I don't know what *normative basis* one needs for this. if you think that Cheney, et al. make a credible case, then there's little I can say that would sway you. I find your characterization of my position as one of *moral outrage* laughable. I mean, this is very funny! Lynn Cheney in the same breath as Foucault? jb... In a message dated 09/23/2000 1:36:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time, comertod-AT-msu.edu writes: << Maybe I'm out of my depth here, but from what normative basis can you make the above value judgement ("I don't")? The fact that, as far as I can tell, Foucault does not provide such a basis strikes me as exactly the argument that "conservatives" like Cheney (or some Marxists) would make. Foucault's project provides no basis for your moral outgrage and this is a glaring fault in my opinion. I think this would be where "relatavism" would enter for Cheney. Frankly, it is not clear to me how one can argue the silencing of one group in favor of another after reading Foucault--or perhaps I am misreading your post? >>
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005