Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 21:38:10 -0700 From: Dan Smith <dls216-AT-psu.edu> Subject: Re: Archaeology of Knowledge, The trace unless i'm mistaken, it's part of a series that describes approaches to discourse other than the one foucault's proffering; in this context, examining statements "in the systematic form of exteriority" (120). At 07:45 PM 10/16/00 -0500, you wrote: >Well, i found the sentence i was looking for...on pg 121... "it ['this >other history'] can be purified in the problematic of the trace, which, >prior to all speech, is the opening of inscription, the gap of deferred >time, it is always the historico-transcendental theme that is reinvested". > >unfortunately, i'm having difficulty understanding the context surrounding >this statement.. if he's summarizing a line of thought that he wishes to >move beyond, or placing his analyses of the statement within this >thought. help? > >loren > > >At 08:24 PM 10/16/00 -0700, you wrote: >>hi loren, >> >>try pages 104 and 105 of AK. -- dan smith >> >>At 06:39 PM 10/16/00 -0500, you wrote: >> >there is a place in AK foucault specifically mentions the trace (in the >> >derridian sense; or--probably in the derridian sense).. I've looked all >> >over for it, because i've seen it before when referenced in a secondary >> >source.. does anyone know where that might be? (arguably the entirety of >> >the book is a critique of the trace, but i'm looking for an explicit >> mention) >> > >> >loren >> > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005