File spoon-archives/foucault.archive/foucault_2000/foucault.0012, message 3


From: "Adam Greenow" <adam-AT-porthcawl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Message:power
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:08:57 -0000


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


Productive (positive), it is something that is practised not possessed. It requires resistance or it isn't an exercise of power. I guess when there is no capacity for resistance then you have asymmetrical power relations, but this isn't really a power relation any more but one of domination. That's why Foucault says power can never be merely repressive. Kendall and Wickham give a convincing outline in 'Using Foucault's Methods', but I find their conclusion that we mustn't oppose or support power silly. The Cambridge Companion, p. 105 - 107 is worth reading. 

Regards,

Adam

----- Original Message -----
  From: Tom Morley
  To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
  Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 12:54 PM
  Subject: Message:power




  Message: Is power 'repressive' or 'productive'?

  Thanks

  Tom Morley

HTML VERSION:

Productive (positive), it is something that is practised not possessed. It requires resistance or it isn't an exercise of power. I guess when there is no capacity for resistance then you have asymmetrical power relations, but this isn't really a power relation any more but one of domination. That's why Foucault says power can never be merely repressive. Kendall and Wickham give a convincing outline in 'Using Foucault's Methods', but I find their conclusion that we mustn't oppose or support power silly. The Cambridge Companion, p. 105 - 107 is worth reading. 
 
Regards,
 
Adam
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Morley
To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 12:54 PM
Subject: Message:power

 
 
Message: Is power 'repressive' or 'productive'?
 
Thanks
 
Tom Morley

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005