From: "Doug Stokes" <dstokes14-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Foucault's Method Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:22:11 -0000 I do not understand the logic here. It seems that you are saying the following: To make an argument against a system of thought you have to first concede that the system of thought is correct. You then create an either / or binary of RIGHT / WRONG. For example, for me to problematise the thought of Stalin i have to concede that he was right because he was either utterly correct or i must concede "that which it attacks". hmmmm > >Yes but in order for you to make these arguments you have to concede that >Foucault's depictions of the world are/were accurate. With that, there goes >the entirety of your argument - it either has no basis or must concede that >which it attacks. > >--- > >Asher Haig ahaig-AT-warped-reality.com >Dartmouth 2004 > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005