From: "TANJU SARI" <tanjus-AT-superonline.com>
Subject: Ynt: Foucault in black Leathers..
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 00:03:38 +0200


I dont think Foucault was evaluating his homosexual side with much
philosophical arguments like we are doing at the moment..This list also
shows that we know far better about Foucault's sexual life than his
theories..
-----Özgün İleti-----
Kimden: Asher Haig <ahaig-AT-warped-reality.com>
Kime: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
<foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Tarih: 01 Şubat 2001 Perşembe 23:53
Konu: Re: Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself?


>on 2/1/01 2:49 PM, John Manoussakis at manoussj-AT-bc.edu wrote:
>
>> Is Juan Cruz a Homosexual himself (in denial perhaps)?
>> It happens to know people who knew Foucault personally and they can
assure
>> anyone with the slightest doubt that Foucault was doing it with guys and
he
>> was enjoying it!
>> The problem is that some people don't get any sex: these are often the
same
>> people who complain about the sexual lives of others!
>> If Juan Cruz has a problem with Foucault's sexuality what is he doing in
>> this list? Why he doesn't rather subscribe to the "Playboy" magazine?
>>
>> John Manoussakis
>> Department of Philosophy
>> Boston College
>
>Perhaps I am misreading what Juan Cruz said, but it seems to me that
>everyone else is doing so as well.
>
>My original interpretation of his post was to see it in a quite humorous
way
>- Foucault was not "a homosexual" - he might have fucked other men (god
>forbid!) but that doesn't create his identity. I think the point is to
>subvert (refuse, wahtever) the pathology of sexuality.
>
>---
>
>Asher Haig           ahaig-AT-warped-reality.com
>Dartmouth 2004
>
>
>