Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:50:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Foucault and pragmatism From: Asher Haig <ahaig-AT-warped-reality.com> on 4/25/01 8:33 PM, kjd23-AT-cornell.edu at kjd23-AT-cornell.edu wrote: > The question remains, however, does > poststructuralism as a method have an ethical content or is it value > neutral? What is poststructuralism, though? If you mean Foucault and "his method" then I don't think there is an intrinsic ethical content but instead a contingent ethical content - ie it's impossible to use without "an ethics" but that ethics is not itself part of "his method." I think that a lot of Foucault's political commitments arise from a combination of liberal normative values with post-liberal political understandings. > This seems to be the critique leveled from folks on the left, > that poststructuralism/ postmodernism has betrayed the Marxist/liberal > cause by severing knowledge from praxis Not severing, I think, but demonstrating how they are ALWAYS inherently interconnected. You don't get to choose whether you have an ethics, but what that ethics is. > (think of Nussbaum's article > where she says that Judith Butler is 'in league with the forces of > evil!'). Yes but Nussbaum is just a moronic liberal who doesn't understand Butler. See above. > I think Foucault's work certainly suggests that he has certain > political commitments (the plight of prisoners, workers, the mentally > ill, and sexual minorities) but can these commitments be derived from his > theories or are they a kind of Marxist/liberal residue? Definitely, but they are always contingent commitments. What foundation do they have? None, probably. Only an imported ethics. > Butler at one > point (I can get the citation) suggests that postmodernism has no > normative base, that it is merely a set of methodological tools that > could presumably be put in the service of good or bad causes, that the > political/ethical content has to come from somewhere else. Any thoughts? That's how I see it. In terms of being good/bad, I think Foucault has a strong point in saying that nothing is good or bad but everything is dangerous - any ideology can be manipulated and used either for good or bad. --- Asher Haig ahaig-AT-warped-reality.com Dartmouth 2004 "It would be helpful if we opened up ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge). I think it's a mistake not to. And I would urge you all to travel up there and take a look at it, and you can make the determination as to how beautiful that country is." -- Bush, referring to allowing Oil Drilling in the ANWR. Press conference, Washington, D.C., March 29, 2001
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005