Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 11:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jivko Georgiev <jivkox43georgiev-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 


Oh, Yes!That, what you say, is absolutely correct. And
that is the breakdown of the pragmatists.They cannot
invent. Therefor they are not filosofers.
--- Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms-AT-kabelfoon.nl> wrote:
> How's his prostate ;-)? No, serious, it seems to me
> that he's loosing 
> the inventiveness to use others thoughts, which to
> me is one of the most 
> essential capabilities a philospher needs.
> 
> erik
> 
> Nathan Goralnik wrote:
> 
> > So Rorty says he became too "disaffected" to keep
> teaching Foucault. He
> > thinks Foucault is "politically useless." He
> agrees with me that Alan Sokal
> > is an idiot and that Douglas Kellner maybe isn't
> qualified to write the
> > books he's writing. He thinks Lacan's project is
> kind of worthless, and
> > isn't too into Kristeva or Deleuze and Guattari.
> He didn't disagree with me
> > that Nussbaum is crap. He's pro-choice.
> > 
> > ~Nate
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > "The living body is a loving body, and the loving
> >  body is a speaking body. Without love we are
> nothing
> >  but walking corpses. Love is essential to the
> living
> >  body, and it is essential in bringing the living
> >  body to life in language."  ~Kelly Oliver
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/