Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 16:56:38 -0700 From: "pcrugh.geo-AT-justice.com" <pcrugh.geo-AT-justice.com> Subject: Re: ariel and the police Forgive me, but I do not understand much of this, and this isn't at all a complaint. I am not much of a James fan or expert. Have never heard of Stevens. I study the history of philosophy, which is currently in the philosophy of science. Pragmatists took just a slight more different approach than positivists. and, here i am guessing. Foucault was bored with sex. James didn't have a lot to say about it. So, I'm curious. what makes this bunch sexy? because if its better than porn, I'll read it. but that's all any one has to say. blah, blah, blah okay, I will go check it out. where can I find it? Orpheus wrote: > Is the Name of a Book by Frank Lentrichia > ==Michel Foucault, William James, Wallace Stevens > > which is you gotta admit one sexy line-up > > if repression is forgetting what you forget and forgetting the > whole operation, and then some, then expression is the > Con-Verse as well. Wallace Stevens saysin a short > essay about Marianne Moore that poets are egotists. > Elsewhere she has read that they envious, jealous, and > competitive. That readings are a function of the tribal ego. > > But breathlessly and at last, that Writing certainly does > --- speaking. > > -- But love is not repressive but tragic; i.e. observe > the constant theft of work by lesser known writers by > better established characters. 'What kind of planet is this > the whole thing's going to blow, go Nova. Lee narrowed his > eyes staring at Orphee Francais, and heard Orphee lesbobisexual- > built for two pop her robin and cry; such was the archeology > of desire. And French was not superior. I am Kathy Acker.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005