From: "Clifford Duffy" <cwduff-AT-hotmail.com> Subject: Sartre -- Critique Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:46:01 -0400 .Stuart -- you raise an interesting point. A well-written and interesting on these matters is Reason and Violence -- A Decade of Sarte --- R.D.Laing and David Cooper. The question as to whether Sartre changed his angle somewhat is denied by Sartre . In his own words he depasse(d) his earlier work and included it in the new synthesis.. More later.. this is a fast riposte to your comments. --- The Heidegger Marx Sartre circle is another matter. And more complex... Must run. I have my existential hole to fill. With desiring-productions. > >Now I don't want to discount that Rorty may have misquoted, but on my >limited knowledge of Sartre the first sounds like the Sartre of Being and >Nothingness and Existentialism is a Humanism; the second we know is from >Search for a Method (part of the Critique of Dialectical Reason). There's a >fairly major shift in Sartre's work between these two projects, and that >may >explain the similar, though clearly fundamentally different, claims. > >As Lefebvre said in his 1946 L'existentialisme: 'it is possible that M. >Sartre does not understand the difference between Heidegger and Marx'. >Maybe >by the Critiques he'd realised the difference between _his_ >misunderstanding >of Heidegger and his (mis?) understanding of Marx... > >Just a suggestion - it may well be completely wrong! > >Stuart > > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005