From: "Nathan Goralnik" <rhizome85-AT-home.com> Subject: Re: more on rorty Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 03:47:35 -0700 Nathan > Vietnam, Grenada, and the rest to be suspicious: you don't have a problem > with the way liberal society defines criminal delinquency, sexual deviancy, > the unemployed, single mothers, benefits seekers? Sure, but what would be post-liberal about changing all that around? I mean, how strictly are we using the word "liberal"? I suppose you're right...we have to use it pretty strictly to avoid getting co-opted by people like Rorty. I get disgusted by what I read in the newspaper all the time...I guess I just never make the conscious association of what I see with liberalism. Thanks for correcting that unthought - kind of a significant and embarrassing one, at that Nate
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005