Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:42:03 +0100 From: newidder <N.E.Widder-AT-exeter.ac.uk> Subject: RE: more on rorty >Sure, but what would be post-liberal about changing all that around? I mean, >how strictly are we using the word "liberal"? I suppose you're right...we >have to use it pretty strictly to avoid getting co-opted by people like >Rorty. I get disgusted by what I read in the newspaper all the time...I >guess I just never make the conscious association of what I see with >liberalism. Your previous post suggested that by liberalism you meant standard Anglo-American academic liberalism ("what people's problems are with liberal politics. Because I share Rorty's politics..."), which Rorty accepts and tries to defend by anti-foundationalist arguments. What you are saying here sounds more like some sort of liberal sentiment ("I get disguested by what I read in the newspaper all the time"). Even Foucault had some of those, and didn't think they were all that bad, similar to the way Nietzsche accepted that the sentiments of Christian morality (i.e., treat others well) were not so bad, it was rather the ressentiment which underpinned them (See Daybreak, n. 103). I don't know anyone who gets called a "post-liberal" who wants to see people denied their rights, treated unequally, etc. Nathan > >Thanks for correcting that unthought - kind of a significant and >embarrassing one, at that No prob. Your welcome. Nathan > >Nate Dr. Nathan Widder Lecturer in Political Theory University of Exeter Department of Politics Amory Building Rennes Drive Exeter EX4 4RJ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1392 263 183 Fax: +44 (0)1392 263 305 http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/staff/widder/
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005