From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Re: A twist to dossier and gaze
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:32:12 


I think Erik has expressed what I mean.  Perhaps there is more to it than 
that, but from what you have said it is fair game to interpret Foucault's 
GAZE and DOSSIER in this way.

Thanks

Lionel

>From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms-AT-kabelfoon.nl>
>Reply-To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>To: foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Subject: Re: A twist to dossier and gaze
>Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:07:13 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [128.143.2.9] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBD9E7106002A40042A0C808F0209E2AA0; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:10:48 -0700
>Received: from lists.village.virginia.edu by mail.virginia.edu id aa09153;  
>         23 Oct 2001 4:09 EDT
>Received: (from domo-AT-localhost)by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.0) 
>id EAA03951for foucault-outgoing; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 04:07:50 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: from hirogen.kabelfoon.nl (hirogen.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.45.69])by 
>lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA03946for 
><foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 04:07:44 -0400 
>(EDT)
>Received: from kabelfoon.nl (kf-sdm-fp04-079.dial.kabelfoon.nl 
>[62.45.28.207])by hirogen.kabelfoon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB627C17for 
><foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:07:41 +0200 
>(CEST)
>From owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:11:54 
>-0700
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to 
>owner-foucault-AT-localhost using -f
>Message-ID: <3BD52531.6070503-AT-kabelfoon.nl>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 
>Netscape6/6.1
>X-Accept-Language: en-us
>References: <F2591dSlWnPdQ2KJPOG0000e0a7-AT-hotmail.com>
>Sender: owner-foucault-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
>Precedence: bulk
>
>The gaze is a implicite and mostly secret judgement, the dossier, as I
>see it, is a kind of shield against the gaze. An institution that
>causes an enviremental disaster shows it's unreasponsible behaviour or
>character to the public gaze, or it becomes that way because of hte
>gaze. The gaze is everwhere off course, alos inside the corporation. The
>gaze becomes solidified in public memory. The dossier would be a piece
>of selfproduced memory which has to replace the existing one. Obviously
>there's a tension between the 'wild, unproductive' gaze of the public
>and the 'domesticated, productive' gaze of the company.
>
>erik
>
>Lionel Boxer wrote:
>
>>I have been chatting offline with Lisa Hennon regarding gaze and
>>dossier.  This posting is to solicit feedback about what I am trying
>>to do with gaze and dossier.
>>
>>The dossier I am referring to is one that relates to an event.  For
>>example, the official corporate line regarding an environmental
>>disaster caused by the the company.  I was interviewing a
>>petrochemical CEO and, rather than talk about the event, the CEO said
>>he would give me a copy of the confidential report.
>>
>>The way I am considering dossier and gaze is that the dossier on the
>>event enables the manager to direct a gaze that implies 'everything is
>>fine and don't worry ... we have everything under control ... it will
>>not re-occur.'
>>
>>This seems to be something entirely different from what is in
>>Discipline and Punish (I am half way through that now.)
>>
>>Any comments?
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>>
>>
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp