From: "Stuart Elden" <stuart.elden-AT-clara.co.uk> Subject: RE: Genealogies of Difference Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:08:08 -0000 Nathan and Yves I don't really have time to engage with your discussion, but I just wanted to say I thought it was extremely interesting, and that I look forward to reading the book. The relationship between genealogy and ontology is one that interests me a lot, and I like the suggestion that >But the way my interests in this project developed it took me into reading the likes of Aristotle and Duns Scotus and I didn't want for that reason for it to be thought of as a historical project. But I also think that in the context of a fairly standard (but I think often completely fallacious) complaint that "postmodernists" rejects modernism and its past without having adequate knowledge or appreciation of it (note, this complaint issues from the same mouths that also complain that these damned postmodernists historicize everything), there is a need to show that an ontology of difference implies a reapproach and reengagement with philosophies of the past, and that there is a way of reading them rigorously that is not for that reason "historical". Even Derrida, in Positions, explains his deconstruction of philosophy in terms of a "structured genealogy of philosophy's concepts" that has been dismissed by the history of philosophy.(p. 6 of the English translation). Lots of good ideas in there! Best wishes Stuart
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005