Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 04:01:34 -0500 (CDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?nairda=20oremor?= <oxanairda-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: > but I don't think there is > anything in his philosophy > that would claim his methods only for his own use. I can hesitate this certitude: we must remember that the arquelogycal method claims for a tranversal cut that analyses biology, economy and linguistic disciplines to break a epistemical epoch... Genealogycal method rather continues this arqueologycal implicance...the disruptive point of his method might be related to surveiller et punir as the difurcation between the arquelogy of knowledge and the genelogy of power... Besides gobermentality is not merely a method but a concept that is not methologycally developed, and points to a subjetive fase of his thought related to power and dispositives.... adr _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005